| Main    Country Page: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/ENACARegion/Pages/PLIndex.aspxInter-active Dialogue:  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/PLWebArchives.aspx
 
                     
 Universal Periodic Review    April 2008 as Preparation for the Universal Periodic Review 2012. This is NOT    a submission to the UN for a Universal Periodic Review. The tentative    schedule for the second cycle review of POLAND is Wednesday 30 May 2012 from    14:30-18:00. The inter-active dialogue can be viewed live on the OHCHR    website, www.ohchr.org   
                     
 BACKGROUND HUMAN RIGHTS &    FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF                      General Comment 22    on Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/9a30112c27d1167cc12563ed004d8f15?Opendocument                     The 1981 UN    Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of    Discrimination Based on Religion or Beliefhttp://www.tandemproject.com/program/81_dec.htm.
                   UN History on    Freedom of Religion or Belief: http://www.tandemproject.com/program/history.htm                   List of Religion or    Belief by Countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations 
                     
 NATIONAL REPORT & WORKING GROUP    – RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING DIRECTLY TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF
 http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/PAGES/PLSession1.aspx National Report: Paragraph    18 of the National Report refers to the Ministry of Interior and    Administration team for Monitoring Racism and Xenophobia.  This refers    indirectly to forms of Related Intolerance as a follow-up to Durban I and I and    will have indirect bearing on the implementation    of A/RES/66/167 by UN General Assembly. Working Group Report:    Conclusions & Recommendations #54 1-29.  There are no direct    references to freedom of religion or belief in the Working Group Report for    Poland.  
                     
 REPORTS OF THE SPECIAL    RAPPORTEUR ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/FreedomReligionIndex.aspx                     The Special    Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief has not paid a country visit to    Poland.  The Resolution on Freedom of Religion or Belief    A/HRC/19/L.23 was adopted by consensus at the nineteenth session of the UN    Human Rights Council on March 22, 2012.  http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/19/L.23 
                     
 CONSTITUTION OF POLAND http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Poland 
                    
                      | The preamble emphasizes freedom of religion or disbelief: "We,      the Polish Nation - all citizens of the Republic, Both those who believe in      God as the source of truth, justice, good and beauty, As well as those not      sharing such faith but respecting those universal      values as arising from other sources...". Article 25 provides      further protection, that public officials "shall be impartial in      matters of personal conviction, whether religious or philosophical, or in      relation to outlooks on life, and shall ensure their freedom of expression      within public life." |  
                      |  |  |  
                     
  A  CULTURE OF TOLERANCE AND    PEACE BASED ON RELIGION OR BELIEF                     On December 19, 2011 resolution    A/RES/66/167 was adopted by consensus by the United Nations General    Assembly, after several years of contentious issues between the European    Union (EU), Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), and other UN Member    States. A/RES/66/167 is a hopeful beginning for resolution of these    issues.   United Nations    Resolution – a Culture of Tolerance & Peace Based  on Religion or    Belief Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,    stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against    persons, based on religion or belief  Introduced by    Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference     (OIC)  adopted by consensus without a vote. - Resolution    A/HRC/16/18/L.38, Geneva, March 24 2011 Recognizes that the open    public debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at    the local, national and international levels can be among the best protections    against religious intolerance, and can play a positive role in strengthening    democracy and combating religious hatred, and convinced that a continuing    dialogue on these issues can help overcome existing misperceptions.  Calls for strengthened    international efforts to foster a global dialogue for the promotion of a    culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for human    rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to convene a panel    discussion on this issue at its seventeenth session within existing    resources. Pakistan (on behalf of the OIC) Mr.    Zamir Akram   [English] 10 minutes Saudi Arabia Mr. Ahmed Suleiman Ibrahim    Alaquil  [English]    [Arabic] 1 minute Norway Ms. Beate Stirø  [English] 2 minutes United States    of America Mr. Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe  [English] 5 minutes Hungary (on behalf of the European Union) Mr.    András Dékány  [English] 3 minutes UN Human Rights    Council Panel Statements, Resolution A-HRC-16-18, 2010 General Assembly Third    Committee Actions Introduced by    United Arab Emirates on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference    (OIC) adopted by consensus without a vote – Resolution A/C.3/66/L.47, New    York, 15 November 2011                  UN Third Committee    Press Release - Resolution L.47 Adopted by Consensus
 http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/C.3/66/L.47/Rev.1
 The Resolution identified as    A/RES/66/147 by the General Assembly welcomes the establishment of the “King    Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and    Intercultural dialogue in Vienna, initiated by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia    on the  basis of purposes and principles enshrined in the Universal    Declaration of Human Rights, and acknowledging the important role that this    Centre is expected to play as a platform for the enhancement of    interreligious and intercultural dialogue.”  -    King Abdulaziz Dialogue Center – Vienna http://www.kacnd.org/eng/ 
                    Surely one    of the best hopes for humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions    and other beliefs accept one another, in which wars and violence are not    tolerated in the name of an exclusive right to truth, in which children are    raised to solve conflicts with mediation, compassion and understanding. REFLECTIONS - The    Tandem Project 
                     
 ISSUES & CHALLENGES                        Anders Behring Breivik is the    ethnic Norwegian perpetrator of the most horrific acts of terrorism in Norway    since WW II. In an opinion page article in the New York Times, 31 July 2011,    by Thomas Hegghammer, Senior Research Fellow of the Norwegian Defense Research    Establishment, Breivik is quoted as saying he is “extremely proud of his    Odinistic/Norse heritage and while he is Christian admits ‘I’m not a very    religious person.’ “While Breivik’s violent acts are exceptional, his    anti-Islamic views are not. His goal is to reverse what he views as the    Islamization of Western Europe.”   Assimilation’s    Failure, Terrorism’s Rise 
                     
 FOCUS GROUPS ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION    OR BELIEF                     Focus Groups on    Freedom of Religion or Belief are proposed at local levels to support United    Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/66/167. Focus Group Question:  Will    A/RES/66/167 protect your right to freedom of religion or belief, cultural    identity, principles and values at a local level? 
                     
 FOR DISCUSSION                     The Tandem Project selects    excerpts for discussion from a variety of sources for the Focus Group on    Freedom of Religion or Belief.  Excerpts are selected for local    discussion and dialogue on A/RES/66/167 - Recognizes    that the open public debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and intercultural    dialogue at the local, national and international levels can be among the    best protections against religious intolerance, and can play a positive role    in strengthening democracy and combating religious hatred, and convinced that    a continuing dialogue on these issues can help overcome existing    misperceptions.                      The Tandem Project does    not endorse articles for discussion.  Church Subsidy    Reform Signals Polish Revolution.  Human Rights Without Frontiers    Newsletter, HRWF, 05 April 2012.  AFP    (02.04.2012) - A revolution is under way in Poland as the government moves to    cut large subsidies for Poland's powerful Catholic Church and give taxpayers    more choice in funding it.   The    rise of a new anti-clerical party is symptomatic of growing pressure to    reduce the traditionally strong ties between Church and State as more liberal    influences flood in from western Europe.   "Cut    the umbilical cord!" shouted Polish feminists at a recent rally in the    capital Warsaw, reflecting changing opinions in the homeland of the late pope    John Paul II.   According    to various sources, the Catholic Church receives between 300 and 350 million    Euros ($398-464 million) a year in state subsidies, and the move by the    centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk affects less than 10    percent of this sum.                      It    is enough however to cause alarm and indignation in the Catholic hierarchy,    which fears it is the thin end of the wedge.   Tusk's    government announced last week its intention to liquidate, as part of a    broader pension reform, a state fund used to finance social security    contributions for priests.  Created    under the former communist regime, the fund was ostensibly designed to    compensate the Church for the nationalization of its properties but other    denominations and religions also benefit.   Last    year, the subsidy totaled 89 million zlotys (21.5 million Euros), with the    Catholic Church the main beneficiary.   To    replace it, the government has proposed that from 2013 taxpayers can choose    to allocate 0.3% of their income tax bill to a church or religious community    of their choice.  Authorities    predict the new system will generate about 100 million zlotys in social    insurance coverage which will apply to the minority Jewish and Islamic as    well as Christian clergy in Poland.   But    this is not going far enough for the new openly anti-clerical Palikot    Movement, which stormed into parliament in October elections.   The    party founded and led by Janusz Palikot, came from nowhere to take third spot    in the polls and 40 out of the 460 seats, even though 90 percent of Poles    still declare themselves to be Catholic.   "Just    for catechism lessons in schools, the state spends the equivalent of 100    million Euros a year. Why don't we use that money to build pre-schools, when    it's apparent that we have the biggest nursery school shortage in    Europe?" former vodka tycoon Palikot said in an interview with AFP.   Church    fathers have not minced their words in slamming the pension reform, while    calling for negotiations with the government.   "It    was a premeditated attack against the Church. There are those who are seeking    to accumulate political capital," thundered Archbishop Jozef Michalik,    chairman of the Polish bishops' conference.   "The    religious war lasted 50 years, during the time of communist Poland. We don't    want another one and we are open to dialogue, a substantive discussion,"    said Leszek Slawoj Glodz, Archbishop of Gdansk.   "From    a financial standpoint, this is negligible, but symbolically it is political    dynamite," said Adam Szostkiewicz, a commentator specializing in    religious matters.   In    liquidating the fund, he told AFP, the government wants to play the equality    card as it imposes reforms on Polish pensions that will affect a range of    social groups.   The    Church, meanwhile, is afraid that the State may end all funding in the    future,  "The    Church is terrified that eventually it will establish the kind of tax system    there is in Germany" where people are obliged to designate a specific    religious institution as a beneficiary for a supplementary part of their    taxes.   "The    Church still wants everyone to approach it on their knees," said    Stanislaw Obirek, an anthropologist and former Jesuit.   However,    he added, "Society will cease to be just a milch-cow. It will become a    partner which is either willing or unwilling to give the Church money. The    Church isn't ready for this revolution." 
                     
  SEPARATION OF RELIGION OR BELIEF    AND STATE - SOROBAS www.sorobas.com Separation of Religion or    Belief and State – SOROBAS is a term used by The Tandem Project to express the core principles of    international human rights law on freedom of religion or belief. The term has    a long history with diverse interpretations. Separation of Church and State.                      Modern technology, travel and    communications have brought religions and other beliefs, and cultures closer    than ever before in human history.  The balance between assimilation and    multiculturalism is a  great challenge for our age. Separation of    Religion or Belief and State – SOROBAS brings separation of church and state,    separation of synagogue and state, separation of mosque and state, separation    of temple and state, and separation of other sacred places and associations    and state, together under an umbrella term of respect for each other and    international human rights law on freedom of religion or belief.   There is an increase in    dialogue today between religions and other beliefs to embrace diversity, but    few persons, less than one percent of any population, ever participate. The    value of such dialogues is proportionate to the level of participation. Separation    of Religion or Belief and State - SOROBAS will create opportunities for inclusive    and genuine human rights education on freedom of religion or belief.  1986 first    international conference on the 1981 UN Declaration was held on Tolerance    for Diversity of Religion or Belief http://www.tandemproject.com/tolerance.pdf 1998, Oslo Conference on    Freedom of Religion or Belief was the catalyst for a change of title from UN    Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance to UN Special Rapporteur on    Freedom of Religion or Belief  1998 UN Conference    Report 2006, 25 Year    Commemoration of the 1981 UN Declaration was celebrated in Prague, Czech    Republic, sponsored by the Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights with    contributions from the Netherlands. 1981 UN Declaration –    25 Year Commemoration 2012,  The Tandem Project will launch Separation of    Religion or Belief and State – SOROBAS, a new website of The Tandem Project in 2012, www.sorobas.com The Tandem    Project believes until a core legally-binding human rights treaty, a    Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief,  is adopted, international    human rights law will be incomplete. 
                     
 FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF U.S. State    Department 2010 International Religious Freedom Report, Poland http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2010/148971.htm November    17, 2010 
                     
 The constitution provides for    freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally    free practice of religion.  The government generally    respected religious freedom in practice. There was no change in the status of    respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period.There were reports of    societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or    practice; however, prominent societal leaders took positive steps to promote    religious freedom. Anti-Semitic sentiment persisted among some elements of    society and within marginal political parties; however, the government    publicly denounced anti-Semitic acts. There were occasional desecrations of    Jewish and Roman Catholic cemeteries.
  The U.S. government discusses    religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to    promote human rights. U.S. embassy and consulate general officials actively    monitored threats to religious freedom and sought further resolution of    unsettled legacies of the Holocaust and the communist era.  Section I. Religious    Demography                     The country has an area of    120,725 square miles and a population of 38 million. More than 94 percent of    the population is Roman Catholic. Groups that constitute less than 5 percent    of the population include Polish Orthodox, Jehovah's Witnesses, Lutherans    (Augsburg Confession), Greek Catholic, and others. In addition, according to    the 2009 Annual Statistical Yearbook of Poland, there were 3,332 registered    members of Jewish associations and 112 registered members of Muslim    associations. These figures do not account for persons who adhere to a    particular faith but do not maintain formal membership, and consequently the    data for Jews and Muslims in particular are significantly deflated. Jewish and    Muslim organizations estimated their actual numbers to be 20,000 and 25,000,    respectively.  The majority of asylum    seekers are Muslims from Chechnya. In the country's refugee centers, they    organize their own mosques where they practice their religion.  Section II. Status of    Government Respect for Religious Freedom Legal/Policy Framework                     The constitution provides for    freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally    free practice of religion.  The criminal code stipulates    that offending religious sentiment through public speech is punishable by a    fine or a maximum three-year prison term.  Citizens have the right to    sue the government for constitutional violations of religious freedom, and    legal protections cover discrimination or persecution of religious freedom.  There are 15 religious groups    whose relationship with the state is governed by specific legislation that    outlines the internal structure of the religious groups, their activities,    and procedures for property restitution. There are 155 other registered    religious groups that do not have a statutorily defined relationship with the    state. All registered religious groups, including the original 15, enjoy    equal protection under the law. In accordance with the 1998 concordat, the government    and the Roman Catholic Church participate at the highest levels in a Joint    Government-Episcopate Task Force, which meets regularly to discuss    church-state relations.  The government observes the    following religious holidays as national holidays: Easter Monday, Corpus    Christi Day, Assumption of the Virgin Mary, All Saints' Day, Christmas, and    St. Stephen's Day.  Religious communities may    register with the Ministry of the Interior; however, they are not required to    do so and may function freely without registration. The law requires that to    register, a group must submit the names of at least 100 members as well as    other information. Information on membership must be notarized, although the    registration itself often appears to be a formality. All registered religious    groups receive the same privileges, such as duty-free importation of office    equipment and reduced taxes. During the reporting period, the following new    religious groups registered: Beit Polska, Jewish Progressive Community of    Poland, the Churches of Christ Association, Sangha Dogen Zenji, and Slavic    Faith.  The constitution gives    parents the right to raise their children in accordance with their own    religious and philosophical beliefs. Religious education classes are taught    in the public schools. In theory, children have a choice between religious    instruction and ethics. Although Roman Catholic Church representatives teach    the vast majority of these religion classes, parents may request classes    taught by representatives from any of the legally registered religious groups    to fulfill the religious education requirement; however, there were reports    that accommodating the needs of religious minorities was a problem. While not    common, the Ministry of Education pays for non-Catholic religious instruction    in some circumstances, such as Polish Orthodox classes in the eastern part of    the country. Religious education instructors, including clergy, receive    salaries from the state for teaching religion in public schools. Catholic    Church representatives are included on a commission that determines which    books qualify for school use.  Restrictions on Religious    Freedom  The government generally    respected religious freedom in practice. There was no change in the status of    respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period.Religion classes are taught    in public schools. Students may request to take an ethics class or a    personalized religion class if they do not wish to take the standard course.    Where an alternate class is not available, students may opt to spend the    class time in supervised study. According to the Helsinki Foundation for    Human Rights, there were challenges in organizing ethics classes for students    who did not attend religion classes, which resulted in indirect    discrimination against students belonging to minorities. The foundation noted    that a specific regulation requiring a minimum of seven students to organize    a separate religion or ethics class is a significant impediment for many    schools, particularly in rural areas.
  On June 15, 2010, the    European Court of Human Rights issued a ruling in response to a 2002 case    filed by a Polish family over the practice of including grades from religion    or ethics classes on students' report cards. The court ruled that the absence    of a mark for "religion/ethics" on the students' school transcripts    amounted to a form of unwarranted stigmatization, which violated the European    Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The    court dismissed a corresponding claim that the lack of choice between ethics    and religion classes in some schools was a violation the convention. On    December 2, 2009, the Constitutional Court ruled that an Education Ministry    directive, which stated that grades for religious education should be included    in students' overall grade point averages, did not violate the constitution.  Although the constitution    provides for the separation of religion and state, crucifixes hang in both    the upper and lower houses of parliament as well as in many other public buildings,    including public school classrooms.  The government continued to    work with both local and international religious groups to address property    claims and other sensitive matters stemming from Nazi- and communist-era    confiscations and persecutions. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is largely responsible    for coordinating relations between the government and international    organizations, although the president and prime minister also play an    important role. The government cooperates effectively with a variety of    international organizations, both governmental and nongovernmental, for the    preservation of historic sites, including cemeteries and houses of worship.    However, problems regarding property restitution and preservation of historic    religious sites and cemeteries remained only partially settled.  Progress continued in    implementing the laws enacted in the 1990s providing for the restitution to    religious communities of property owned prior to World War II that    subsequently was nationalized. Five commissions--one each for the Catholic    Church, Jewish community, Lutheran Church, and Orthodox Church; and one for    other denominations--supervised by the interior minister oversee religious    property claims. Of approximately 10,000 communal property claims, more than    5,200 had been resolved and more than 1,200 properties had been returned by    August 31, 2009. However, concerns remained with the slow pace of Jewish    communal property restitution.  The last restitution law was    enacted in 1997 and provided for the Jewish community to submit property    claims. The law granted a five-year period, the longest period allowed for    any religious group, to file claims for synagogues, cemeteries, and community    centers as well as buildings that were used for other religious, educational,    or charitable activities. The Jewish community submitted 5,504 claims by the    May 2002 filing deadline. As of August 31, 2009, 1,722 claims had been    partially or entirely concluded.  Laws concerning restitution    of property to the Catholic Church were enacted in 1989. The deadline for    filing claims ended in 1992. As of August 31, 2009, a total of 2,812 of the    3,063 claims filed by the Catholic Church had been either partially or    entirely concluded. In May 2010 the Warsaw prosecutor's office charged two    members of the Catholic restitution commission with corruption and providing    false statements that allegedly underestimated the values of property    returned to the Catholic Church. Five additional persons were being    investigated.  The Lutheran Church, for    which the filing deadline was 1996, filed claims for 1,200 properties. As of    September 18, 2009, 905 cases had been partially or entirely concluded.  As of August 31, 2009, 354 of    the 472 claims filed by the Orthodox Church had been partially or entirely    concluded. The deadline for filing claims ended in 2005.  The property commission for    all other denominations received a total of 168 claims. As of August 31,    2009, the commission had partially or entirely concluded 68 cases. The    deadline for filing claims ended in 1998 for all denominations except the    Baptist Church and Protestant Reform Church, which had until July 2006.  The laws on communal property    restitution do not address the topic of communal properties to which private    third parties had title, leaving several controversial and complicated cases    unresolved. In a number of cases, buildings and residences were built on land    that included Jewish cemeteries destroyed during or after World War II.  There is no comprehensive law    on returning or compensating for privately held real property confiscated    during World War II or the communist era. During the reporting period, the    government continued to develop legislation to establish an administrative    process through which claimants could receive partial compensation for    private property confiscations, in lieu of in-kind restitution. Since the    1990s parliament has made several attempts to enact such legislation. Some    restitution claimants have regained title to their property through court    action or government administrative decisions. In addition, since 2001 more than    $150 million (513 million zloty) was paid in compensation from the State    Treasury Reprivatization Fund for illegally nationalized private property.    Compensation payments were also made to persons who lost private property as    a result of state persecution. The lack of legislation precluded simpler    recourse through more expeditious administrative channels; this affected    individuals of many religious groups seeking restitution or compensation for    property confiscated during and after World War II.  On June 8, 2010, the country    joined 42 others in Prague in reaching agreement on guidelines and best    practices relating to the restitution of, or compensation for, immovable    (real) property confiscated during the Holocaust (1933-45) and as an    immediate consequence of the Holocaust. These guidelines were developed in    response to the Terezin Declaration issued at the end of the June 2009 Prague    Conference on Holocaust Era Assets, in which the country also participated.    The voluntary and nonbinding guidelines encourage states to develop fair and    transparent processes to handle such claims to immovable property outside of    litigation and through national programs and frameworks. On March 1, 2010, a    representative of the prime minister's chancellery declared in written comments    that while in-kind restitution of property is not feasible in most cases for    a variety of reasons, the government's draft legislation to provide partial    compensation for private property confiscations would strive to conform to    the guidelines. The comments noted the importance of respecting the    constitutional principle of equal treatment of citizens, regardless of    nationality and religion.  The Conference on Jewish    Material Claims Against Germany held its annual meeting in Warsaw in January    2010 and pressed for urgent passage of a private property restitution law    with more-lenient filing requirements.  There were no reports of    religious prisoners or detainees in the country.  Forced Religious Conversion  There were no reports of    forced religious conversion.  Improvements and    Positive Developments in Respect for Religious Freedom                     On May 13, 2010, the foreign    minister presided over the unveiling of a statue in Warsaw to commemorate the    day in 1943 on which the last surviving Jewish fighters escaped the Warsaw    Ghetto.  On January 26, 2010, in    conjunction with the 65th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death    camp at Auschwitz-Birkenau, the Education Ministry hosted an    intergovernmental Holocaust education conference in Oswiecim. The conference,    entitled "Auschwitz--Memory, Responsibility, Education," was    attended by high-level government officials from 32 countries. The conference    explored the importance of Holocaust education and preservation of    Holocaust-related sites as means to combat anti-Semitism and promote    tolerance.On December 15, 2009, the    country's then-First Lady Maria Kaczynska and the Presidential Minister Ewa    Junczyk-Ziomecka honored Jewish leaders for their contributions to the    renaissance of the Jewish community in the country and for their role in    fostering Polish-Jewish dialogue.
  In October 2009 the new    College of Hebraic Studies in Torun began its first class with the enrollment    of students. The college was established by Catholic priest Marek Tandek to    promote the study of Jewish religion, culture, and history.  Section III. Status of    Societal Respect for Religious Freedom                     There were reports of    societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or    practice; however, prominent societal leaders took positive steps to promote    religious freedom.  Isolated incidents of    harassment and violence against Jews continued to occur, almost always linked    to skinheads or other marginal societal groups. The All-Polish Youth,    National Rebirth of Poland, the Polish National Party (PNN), and several    other organizations were known to espouse anti-Semitic views, but there was    no evidence directly linking these groups to incidents of violence.  On June 15, 2010, the    European Commission against Racism and Intolerance criticized the country for    making insufficient progress in fighting anti-Semitism. The commission    acknowledged progress in certain areas; however, it deemed the persistence of    racist and anti-Semitic discourse, lack of comprehensive antidiscrimination    legislation, and vulnerable situation of Roma to be continuing sources of    concern.  In June 2010 a group of boys    between ages nine and 12 years of age vandalized the Social-Cultural Society    of Jews in the town of Zary in the western part of the country, breaking    lamps and windows and drawing swastikas on the walls. Authorities referred    the children to a juvenile court and made their parents liable for covering    the damages.  On May 8, 2010, unidentified    individuals displayed anti-Semitic material at a soccer match in the town of    Rzeszow. Police arrested five persons, two of whom were charged with inciting    hatred against Jews and making death threats.  On March 27, 2010,    approximately 150 persons protested against the construction of a mosque in    Warsaw. The protest was organized by the Future of Europe Association, which    claimed that the mosque's investor was linked to a radical Islamist movement.    The Warsaw city council approved the construction of the mosque and an    attached cultural center, which were being built by the Muslim League of Poland.  On March 18, 2010, a Krakow    court sentenced three persons to two-and-a-half years' imprisonment for    stealing the "Arbeit Macht Frei" sign that hangs above the main    entrance to the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz. The sign was found cut into    three pieces and buried in the woods two days after the theft. Prosecutors    charged a Swedish man, who had ties to a neo-Nazi organization, with    orchestrating the theft. Sweden extradited the man to Poland to stand trial.  On March 13, 2010, vandals    defaced the Holocaust memorial in Krakow on the eve of the commemoration of    the 67th anniversary of the liquidation of the Krakow ghetto. The vandals    spray-painted anti-Semitic slogans and Nazi symbols on the monument. Authorities    removed the graffiti before the commemoration ceremony, during which the    archbishop of Krakow, Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, apologized to Jews on    behalf of all Christians for the incident. At the end of the reporting    period, police had made no arrests.  On July 6, 2009, a Krakow    court convicted a landlord for using anti-Semitic slogans and neo-Nazi    gestures towards two of her tenants, who were of Jewish origin. The woman was    fined $1,700 (5,000 zlotys) and received a suspended prison sentence.  On October 20, 2009, a    Bialystok appeals court suspended the sentences of three underage individuals    who had been sentenced to 12 to 20 months imprisonment for promoting fascism    and race-based hatred. The persons were convicted of drawing swastikas and    writing anti-Semitic slogans on the walls of Bialystok's ghetto and Jewish    cemetery in 2007. The appeals court held that a sentence of imprisonment for    such an offense was too severe for minors.  On December 15, 2009, the    Warsaw prosecutor's office indicted three Polish administrators of Red Watch    for promoting a totalitarian regime and inciting hatred and violence. The    indictment stemmed from a 2006 case in which a Web site maintained by the    anti-Semitic and homophobic group Blood and Honor published names and    personal information of persons from minority groups, human rights    nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and local media. At least 385 persons    were threatened and harassed by the publication. The persons faced up to five    years' imprisonment if convicted.  On February 23, 2010, a    Bialystok court convicted four persons for promoting anti-Semitism and    disseminating anti-Semitic texts with posters and periodicals that were    distributed in Bialystok in 2005. Several persons were charged in the case,    including the head of the extreme-right PNN, Leszek Bubel. However, the court    deferred hearing the case against Bubel due to his poor health. There were no    developments in several other criminal and civil cases against Bubel related    to a 2008 YouTube video in which he boasted about his anti-Semitism and urged    Jews to leave the country. Bubel previously served six months in jail for    inciting racial hostility and defaming Jews.  Occasional cases of cemetery    desecration, including both Jewish and Catholic sites, occurred during the    reporting period, primarily by youthful individuals. For example, in May 2010    vandals damaged 56 tombstones at a Jewish cemetery in Sosnowiec. In April    2010 vandals damaged almost 90 tombstones and a monument to soldiers who died    in World War I at a Jewish cemetery in Wroclaw. In January 2010 vandals    damaged 17 tombstones at a Catholic cemetery in Czelusnica. In November 2009    vandals spray-painted graffiti on tombstones and walls of a Jewish cemetery    in Sopot. In July 2009 vandals defaced the gates of a Jewish cemetery in Gora    Kalwaria near Warsaw, and in a separate incident, vandals damaged 170    tombstones at a Catholic cemetery in Bydgoszcz. Police opened investigations,    which continued at the end of the reporting period.  The government cooperates    with local NGOs and officials of major denominations to promote religious    tolerance and provides support to activities such as the March of the Living,    an event to honor victims of the Holocaust. In 2009 and 2010, the president    hosted several events in honor of citizens who risked their lives to help    Jews during the Holocaust. The president and the government also supported    efforts to build a Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw.    Construction was expected to be completed by 2012. Government representatives    participated in ceremonies commemorating the 67th anniversary of the Warsaw    ghetto uprising.  Interfaith groups worked to    bring together the various religious groups in the country. The Polish    Council of Christians and Jews met regularly to discuss topics of mutual    interest, and the Catholic and Orthodox churches had an active bilateral    commission. The Polish Ecumenical Council, a group that includes most    religious groups other than the Roman Catholic Church, also was active. In    January 2010 Catholic Church officials took part in the Annual Days of    Judaism, intended to promote interfaith dialogue.  There were several    conferences devoted to religion and religious tolerance. On June 17-18, 2010,    the Warsaw School of Economics and the Polish Sociology Society hosted a    conference on linkages between religion and the economy; on April 12-14,    2010, Szczecin University hosted an interdisciplinary conference on language,    religion, and identity; on November 19-20, 2009, the Krakow Private    University hosted an international conference on religion and international    relations; and on September 6-9, 2009, the Krakow Catholic archdiocese hosted    the International Meeting for Peace under the theme "People and    Religions," gathering approximately 500 religious leaders from around the    world.  The March of the Living is an    annual international education program that takes place in the country and    Israel. It brings Jewish teenagers throughout the world to Poland on Yom    Hashoah (Holocaust Memorial Day) to march from Auschwitz to Birkenau, the    largest concentration camp complex built during World War II, and to travel    subsequently to Israel to observe Yom HaZikaron (Israel Memorial Day) and Yom    Ha'Atzmaut (Israeli Independence). The march from Auschwitz to Birkenau took    place on April 12, 2010. There were an estimated 8,500 participants from    across the globe, including Israeli Ambassador to Poland Zvi Ravner, French    Chief Rabbi Gilles Bernheim, U.S. Jewish Federation President Kathy Manning,    U.S. embassy representatives, and Holocaust survivor Mark Seigelman. Polish    high school and university students also participated, as well as an    international Christian group.  Section IV. U.S. Government    Policy                     The U.S. government discusses    religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to    promote human rights. U.S. embassy and Krakow consulate general    representatives regularly monitor matters relating to religious freedom and    interfaith relations, including relations between Christians and Jews, and as    warranted raise concerns with government officials.  During the reporting period,    embassy and consulate general officers met frequently with a wide range of    representatives of religious communities, the government, and local    authorities on such matters as religious freedom, property restitution,    religious harassment, and interfaith cooperation. The embassy and consulate    general actively urged the protection and return of former Jewish cemeteries    throughout the country, participated in several cemetery rededications, and    urged the government and parliament to enact private property restitution    legislation. Embassy and consulate officers maintained contact and attended    events associated with the Orthodox, Protestant, and Muslim minorities.  The ambassador regularly met    with representatives of major religious communities, including leaders of the    Jewish community, to discuss religious freedom. Among others, the ambassador    met with Kazimierz Nycz, archbishop of Warsaw; Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz,    archbishop of Krakow; Jozef Kowalczyk, archbishop of Gniezno and Catholic    primate of Poland; Michael Schudrich, chief rabbi of Poland; and Burt    Schuman, Beit Polska chief rabbi. The ambassador also participated in    multiple events to promote interfaith dialogue, such as the 100th birthday    celebration of Irena Sendler, a Pole who rescued thousands of Jewish children    during the Holocaust; a ceremony commemorating the 15th anniversary of a    Polish-American exchange program operated by the American Jewish Committee    and the Polish Forum for Dialogue Among Nations; an event organized by the    Jewish Foundation for the Righteous in honor of Poles who rescued Jews during    the Holocaust; and study tours organized by the Anti-Defamation League, the    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, and other organizations.  The ambassador served as    honorary patron for a series of events to honor the legacy of Jan Karski, a    Polish courier who brought news of the Holocaust to Western governments    during World War II, and other activities in support of Warsaw's Jewish    history museum. The ambassador also met frequently with government officials    and organizations representing Holocaust survivors to discuss private    property restitution problems. Embassy officers took part in events to    promote tolerance and mutual understanding, including the opening of a Jewish    studies institute in Bialystok. The embassy supported the production of a    film, cosponsored by Humanity in Action and the Polish Jewish Youth    Association, documenting Jewish life in pre-War Poland.  U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor    and Combat Anti-Semitism Hannah Rosenthal met on several occasions in Warsaw    and Krakow with government and community officials. Consulate general    officials routinely attended commemorations at Auschwitz honoring the Jews,    Roma, ethnic Poles, and others killed there. They also monitored developments    regarding historical sites related to the Holocaust, supported efforts at    commemoration and youth education, and facilitated official visits to the    Auschwitz museum.  Every year the mission sends    Polish teachers to the United States for a summer teacher training program on    the Holocaust, cosponsored by the Association of Holocaust Organizations and    the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. In 2010 seven teachers were    selected to participate in the program. The embassy also sent 10 teachers on    a Voluntary Visitors exchange program focused on Holocaust education. Under    the embassy speakers bureau program, U.S. officials visited schools to    discuss tolerance, diversity, and religious freedom in the United States.  On April 16, 2010, for the    third consecutive year, the embassy, in cooperation with the NGO Center for    Citizenship Education and the Center for Education Development (a local    government center for teaching excellence), cohosted a conference for 100    middle and high school teachers from all over the country on Holocaust    education. Mary Johnson, senior researcher from Facing History and Ourselves,    gave the keynote address, held workshops, and met with students, academics,    and experts in Warsaw and Lodz in the week preceding the conference.  On January 27, 2010, a U.S.    presidential delegation attended ceremonies commemorating the 65th    anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp.    Also in January, Special Envoy Rosenthal met in Warsaw with government officials,    Catholic Church representatives, and Jewish organizations. The embassy    organized a roundtable for NGOs and watchdog groups in conjunction with the    visit. In October 2009 U.S. Vice President Joe Biden visited the Monument to    the Heroes of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising to honor the memory of Jews who    perished in the Holocaust.  During the reporting period,    embassy and consulate general officials also worked on various programs with    students and teachers to promote tolerance and religious freedom. These included    a video conference with author and playwright Janet Langhart Cohen and a    conference on multiculturalism in Podlasie, a multiethnic region in the    northeast, cosponsored by the embassy and Humanity in Action Poland.  The consulate general in    Krakow, in cooperation with local partners, continued to host various    programs under its "Bridges of Tolerance" initiative. In December    2009 the consulate general cohosted an event to illustrate the use of art and    new media technologies in promoting tolerance and diversity. Representatives    from other foreign missions and cultural centers took part in the event,    which was covered widely in local media and on Web sites and YouTube. The    consulate general regularly purchases materials focusing on tolerance for    high school English teachers and also has a section called "Resources    for Teachers" on its Web site that includes materials on teaching    tolerance. 
                     
 REFLECTIONS                      The    Tandem Project  The First Preamble to the    Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads: Recognition of the inherent    dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human    family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.  Surely one of the best hopes    for humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions and other beliefs    accept one another, in which wars and violence are not tolerated in the name    of an exclusive right to truth, in which children are raised to solve    conflicts with mediation, compassion and understanding. There is an increase in    dialogue today between religions and other beliefs to embrace diversity, but    few persons, less than one percent of any population, ever participate. This    is a challenge. The value of such dialogues is proportionate to the level of    participation. For civil society increased participation would create    opportunities for education on inclusive and genuine approaches to human    rights and freedom of religion or belief.   In 1968 the United Nations    deferred passage of a legally-binding convention on religious intolerance    saying it was too complicated and sensitive. Instead, they adopted a    non-binding declaration on the elimination of all forms of intolerance and of    discrimination based on religion or belief. While very worthwhile, the    declaration does not carry the force and commitment of a legally-binding    international human rights convention on freedom of religion or belief.  Religions and other beliefs    historically have been used to justify wars and settle disputes. This is more    dangerous today as the possible use of nuclear and biological weapons of mass    destruction increases. Governments need to consider whether religions and    other beliefs trump human rights or human rights trump religions and other beliefs    or neither trumps the other. Can international human rights law help to stop    the advance and use of such weapons in the face of this historic truth? 
                    QUESTION: Weapons of mass destruction as history teaches are often legitimized for    national security and justified by cultural, ethnic, religious or political    ideology. The U.N. Review Conference on the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and    studies on biological and cyber weapons demonstrate advances in science and    technology is being used to increase their potential for mass destruction.    The question is whether an International Convention on Human Rights and    Freedom of Religion or Belief, elevated and supported equally by the U.N.    Human Rights Council and U.N. Security Council, would help offset the risk of    weapons of mass destruction. Recognition of the need for synergy to balance    rights and security is a foundation for solving this issue.  “I am become    death, the destroyer of worlds”                     - Robert    Oppenheimer, quote from the Bhagavad Gita after exploding the first atomic    bomb, Trinity 1945.  The Tandem    Project believes until a core legally-binding human rights Convention on    Freedom of Religion or Belief  is adopted international human rights law    will be incomplete. It may be time to begin to consider reinstating the 1968    Working Group to bring all matters relating to freedom of religion or belief    under one banner, a core international human rights legally-binding treaty.  
                     
 The Tandem Project a    non-governmental organization (NGO) founded in 1986 to build understanding,    tolerance, and respect for diversity of religion or belief, and to prevent    discrimination in matters relating to freedom of religion or belief. The    Tandem Project has sponsored multiple conferences, curricula, reference    material and programs on Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil    and Political Rights- Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought,    conscience and religion – and the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the    Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion    or Belief.  Documents Attached: POLAND - UPR & Freedom of Religion or Belief - 2008-2012; Rights & Beliefs |