| THE  TANDEM PROJECThttp://www.tandemproject.com.
 info@tandemproject.com
 UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS,FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF
 
              The Tandem Project  is a UN NGO in Special Consultative Status with theEconomic and Social Council of the United Nations
 Separation of  Religion or Belief and State BELIEFS &  RIGHTS 
              FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF  “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members  of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the  world.” – First Preamble, United Nations Universal Declaration of Human  Rights, 1948.  Article 18 of the International  Covenant on Civil and Political Rights “protects theistic, non-theistic and  atheistic beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief.”  - General Comment 22 on Article 18, United Nations Human Rights  Committee, 1993.  BELIEFS * Theist: God as revealed, supernatural deity, deities, or spirituality  without dogma.  Non-theist: Universal Mind,  non-theistic mysticism, meditation, pantheism.  Atheist: Not  theist, no revealed or supernatural deity, traditional god or gods.  No Religion or Belief: No religion or belief, or agnostic without  knowledge.  *  Descriptions of Beliefs are not written or endorsed by the United  Nations.  RIGHTS               Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;  this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom,  either alone or in community with others, and in public or private, to manifest  his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. -  Article 18, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966.                Freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief may be subject only to such limitations  as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order,  health or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. Article  18, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966.                 The terms  belief and religion are to be broadly construed. Article 18 is not limited in  its application to traditional religions or to religions and beliefs with  institutional characteristics or practices analogous to those of traditional  religions. Therefore the United Nations Human Rights Committee views with  concern any tendency to discriminate against any religion or belief for any  reasons, including the fact that they are newly established, or represent  religious minorities that may be the subject of hostilities by a predominant  religious community - General Comment 22 on Article 18, United Nations Human  Rights Committee, 1993.                The concept of morals derives from many social, philosophical and  religious traditions; consequently, limitations on the freedom to manifest a  religion or belief for the purpose of protecting morals must be based on  principles not deriving from a single tradition. - General Comment 22 on  Article 18, United Nations Human Rights Committee.
 
              
 REFLECTIONS                THE TANDEM PROJECT  The First Preamble to the  Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads: Recognition of the inherent  dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human  family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.  Surely one of the best hopes  for humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions and other beliefs  accept one another, in which wars and violence are not tolerated in the name of  an exclusive right to truth, in which children are raised to solve conflicts  with mediation, compassion and understanding. There is an increase in  dialogue today between religions and other beliefs to embrace diversity, but  few persons, less than one percent of any population, ever participate. This is  a challenge. The value of such dialogues is proportionate to the level of participation.  For civil society increased participation would create opportunities for  education on inclusive and genuine approaches to human rights and freedom of  religion or belief.   In 1968 the United Nations  deferred passage of a legally-binding convention on religious intolerance  saying it was too complicated and sensitive. Instead, they adopted a  non-binding declaration on the elimination of all forms of intolerance and of  discrimination based on religion or belief. While very worthwhile, the declaration  does not carry the force and commitment of a legally-binding international  human rights convention on freedom of religion or belief.  Religions and other beliefs  historically have been used to justify wars and settle disputes. This is more  dangerous today as the possible use of nuclear and biological weapons of mass  destruction increases. Governments need to consider whether religions and other  beliefs trump human rights or human rights trump religions and other beliefs or  neither trumps the other. Can international human rights law help to stop the  advance and use of such weapons in the face of this historic truth? 
              QUESTION: Weapons of mass destruction as history teaches are often legitimized for  national security and justified by cultural, ethnic, religious or political  ideology. The U.N. Review Conference on the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and studies  on biological and cyber weapons demonstrate advances in science and technology  is being used to increase their potential for mass destruction. The question is  whether an International Convention on Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or  Belief, elevated and supported equally by the U.N. Human Rights Council and  U.N. Security Council, would help offset the risk of weapons of mass  destruction. Recognition of the need for synergy to balance rights and security  is the foundation for solving this issue.  “I am become  death, the destroyer of worlds” - Robert Oppenheimer, quote from the  Bhagavad Gita after exploding the first atomic bomb, Trinity 1945.  In 1968, the  United Nations deferred work on a legally-binding treaty on religious  intolerance as too complex and sensitive and passed a non-binding declaration  in its place. The Tandem Project believes until a core legally-binding human  rights Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief  is adopted  international human rights law will be incomplete. It may be time to begin to  consider reinstating the 1968 Working Group to bring all matters relating to  freedom of religion or belief under one banner, a core international human  rights legally-binding treaty.  
              
 The Tandem Project a  non-governmental organization (NGO) founded in 1986 to build understanding,  tolerance, and respect for diversity of religion or belief, and to prevent  discrimination in matters relating to freedom of religion or belief. The Tandem  Project has sponsored multiple conferences, curricula, reference material and  programs on Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political  Rights- Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and  religion – and the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All  Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.    |