| THE  TANDEM PROJECThttp://www.tandemproject.com.
 info@tandemproject.com
 UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS,FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF
 
              The Tandem Project  is a UN NGO in Special Consultative Status with theEconomic and Social Council of the United Nations
 Separation of  Religion or Belief and State SOMALIA  Somalia is  experiencing violent ethnic and civil war with a devastating impact on the  country. This document is preparation for the May 2011 Somalia Universal  Periodic Review:  The Tandem Project monitors the work of the U.N. Special  Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief and his or her mandate. The Somalia  Universal Periodic Review is an opportunity to consider how the U.N. Human  Rights Council encourages the 2010 mandate of the U.N. Special Rapporteur on  Freedom of Religion or Belief. The Tandem Project Recommendations call for an  International Somalia Contact Group conference in a host country of its  choosing after the Somalia Universal Periodic Review, to encourage compliance  with international human rights law on freedom of religion or belief  in  the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) Charter and the Somaliland and Puntland  constitutions.   This document  includes: I. Universal Periodic Review, II. Somalia Overview, III. The Tandem  Project Recommendations, IV. Contacts, V. U.S. State Department 2010  International Religious Freedom Report on Somalia, VI. Background,  International Human Rights Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief.  
               
 I.UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW
               The Universal Periodic Review  (UPR) is a unique process launched by the UN Human Rights Council in 2008 to  review the human rights obligations and responsibilities of all UN Member  States by 2011. Click to open an Introduction to the Universal Periodic Review  and Current News: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/UPRMain.aspx               The Somalia Universal Periodic  Review will be held by the UN Human Rights Council during the 11th  session of the Universal Periodic Review 2-13 May 2011.  The Somali Review  will be on 3 May 2011 from 1500 to 1800.  On that date you will be able to  click to access the Somali National Report; Compilation prepared by OHCHR;  Summary of Stakeholders Letters prepared by OHCHR; Interactive Dialogue;  Comments & Answers; Final Remarks.    U.N. High  Commissioner for Human Rights Report: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/SOIndex.aspx International Somalia Contact  Group:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Somalia_Contact_Group U.S. State Department Annual  International Religious Freedom Report, The Tandem Project Universal  Periodic Review & Freedom of Religion or Belief source for 195 countries. Somalia: International Religious  Freedom Report 2010
               The  International Somalia Contact Group is an informal group of mainly  Western U.N. Ambassadors established at the U.N. headquarters in New York in  June 2006 to support “peace and reconciliation” in Somalia. Members include; United  States, Norway, Italy Sweden, Tanzania, United Kingdom, Presidency of the  European Union. Invited Observers include: African Union, League of Arab  States, United Nations, Intergovernmental Authority on Development.   Norway chaired the first meeting.  The Organization of the Islamic  Conference (OIC) allegedly has agreed to become part of the international  contact group.  One in three  people with Somali ancestry in the United States lives in Minnesota with an  estimated population ranging from 35,000 to 45,000 mainly in Minneapolis. The  first Muslim elected to the U.S. Congress represents Minneapolis, the fifth  Minnesota Congressional District.  The first Somali -American terrorist  was from Roosevelt High School in Minneapolis.   The Tandem  Project is an NGO based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of  America.  In 1986  the Chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee was  invited to give an address on the meaning of the Nobel Peace Prize at an  International Minnesota Conference on Tolerance for Diversity of Religion or  Belief. This led to an annual Nobel Peace Prize Forum in its twenty-third  year sponsored by five Norwegian-American colleges in the Upper Midwest. http://www.peaceprizeforum.org/               In 1998 The  Tandem Project, founded the idea and co-organized the Oslo Conference on  Freedom of Religion or Belief that led to the Oslo Coalition on Freedom of  Religion or Belief located in the Norwegian Center for Human Rights (NCHR) at  the University of Oslo. http://www.oslocoalition.org/ 
              
                | 
                     
 II.SOMALIA OVERVIEW
 
                    Somalia follows the    Universal Periodic Review process established by the U.N.  Human Rights    Council in resolution 60/251 to “improve the human rights situation in all    countries and address human rights violations wherever they occur.” The    Tandem Project Recommendations format includes the National Report,    Stakeholder Letters, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Report, U.N.    Working Group Report; and the U.S. International Religious Freedom Report and    Tandem Forums  in preparation before and after the Somalia    Universal Periodic Review to monitor their obligations and responsibilities    to international human rights law on freedom of religion during the four year    follow-up cycle. The Tandem Project Recommendations follow these reports and    an explanation of Tandem Forums.     |  |  NATIONAL REPORT: The National Report by the  Transitional Federal Government (TFG) will not be available until the Somali  Universal Periodic Review on 3 May 2011.                 STAKEHOLDER LETTERS: Technical Guidelines for the  Submission of Stakeholders’ Information was due to OHCHR by November 1, 2010.  Letters after this date may not be included in the OHCHR Summary of Stakeholder  Letters.  NGO letters that follow U.N. Human Rights Council guidelines  (link to guidelines below) may be submitted to U.N. Member State delegations as  they prepare for inter-active dialogue up to the time of the review. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/TechnicalGuideEN.pdf U.N. HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT: On  29 September 2010 pursuant to HRC decision 14/119 entitled “Assistance to  Somalia in the field of human rights,” a Stand-alone interactive dialogue was  held on the status of cooperation, capacity-building programmes inside the  country and the effectiveness of United Nations (UN) support in the promotion  and protection of human rights. Click to open the interactive dialogue by the;  U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Independent Expert on the situation of  human rights in Somalia, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for  Somalia, UNDP Coordinator, African Union Commission for Somalia and head  of  (AMISOM), UNHCR representative, Director, World Food Program (WFP),  Chair Somali Peace Line (NGO), National Union of Somali Journalists (NGO),  Amnesty International (NGO), Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (NGO),  and 16 country delegations including the United States and Pakistan  representing the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).  Some delegations  noted the Universal Period Review on Somalia could be a meaningful ways of  keeping international attention on Somalia. The President of the UN Human  Rights Council concluded in closing that now is the time to translate  expression of commitment into concrete actions.  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/SOIndex.aspx
  News Release 11 November 2010:  “UN Experts condemn “brutal summary execution” of teenage girls in Somalia. The  new U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief was one of the six  U.N. independent experts signing this release:  http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10522&LangID=E U.N. WORKING GROUP REPORT: The Working Group  Report will not be issued until after the adoption of the Somali Universal  Periodic Review in the 12th Session of the U.N. Human Rights Council  in 2011.               U.S. INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT: The  Tandem Project identifies the following issues in the 2010 report on Somalia to  be addressed by the mandate of the U.N. Special Rapporteur for the 1981  Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of  Discrimination Based on Freedom of Religion or Belief:  1. “Active violent conflict among  militia groups and the TFG continued during the reporting period. The  Transitional Federal Government (TFG) generally did not enforce legal  protections of religious freedom in practice. There was a decline in the status  of respect for religious freedom during the reporting period as a result of  extremist militias taking control over significant territory in the country  although some territory has been transferred back to the TFG.”   2. “There were reports of  societal abuses and discrimination based on affiliation, belief, and practice.  Militia groups, particularly those associated with the U.S. –designated Foreign  Terrorist Organization (FTO) al-Shabaab harassed persons suspected of  conversion from Islam, killed Sufi clerics, and destroyed Sufi graves and  mosques. There were also reports that non-Muslims experienced discrimination  because of their religious beliefs.   3. “A political process to establish  peace and stability in the country continued as the TFG and the Alliance for  the Reliberation of Somalia (ARS) signed the Djibouti Agreement in 2008. In  January 2009 the TFG and ARS formed a unity government, extended the  transnational period by two years, and elected Sharif Sheikh Ahmed as the new  TFG president. On March 15, 2010, as part of the implementation of the Djibouti  peace process, members of a Sufi affiliation, Ahlu Sunna Wal Jama’a (ASWJ)  signed an agreement to join and support the TFG against armed terrorist and  extremist groups opposed to peace and stability. The charter established Islam  as the national religion. On May 4, 2010, ASWJ militia conducted an operation  to confiscate face veils from women at Dabka junction in Mogadishu. The militia  stopped public passenger vehicles at Dabka intersection and order women to  remove their face veils. The militia forcefully removed the veils from women  who refused to comply with their order and burned the veils.”  4. “The constitution and charters  governing various regions provided the right to study and discuss the religion  of one’s choice; however, proselytizing for any religion other than Islam was  strictly prohibited. The TFG neither observed nor enforced constitutional  provisions guaranteeing the free exercise of religion. Moreover, statutes and  regulations provided no effective recourse for violations of religious  freedom.”  5.  “Similarly, Somaliland  and Puntland established Islam as the official religion in their regions. The  Somaliland constitution prohibited the promotion of any religion other than  Islam. The Somaliland criminal code outlined penalties for Muslims who change  their religion. The constitutions states that candidates for president, vice  president, or the house of representatives must be Muslim and further  stipulates that Islamic education is compulsory at all levels and that the  promotion of Quranic schools is the responsibility of the state.  The  constitution further stated that the laws of the nation shall derive from and  not contradict Islam.”  6. “The Puntland constitution  provides for the freedom to worship; however, it also states that Muslims  cannot renounce their religion. In May 2009 the Puntland cabinet approved a new  constitution; on June 30, 2009, the Puntland parliament approved the  constitution, which went into effect immediately. The new constitution  prohibited propagation of any religion other than Islam.  It states that  non-Muslims are free to practice their religion and cannot be forced to  convert; however, the same article prohibits Muslims from converting from  Islam. Puntland security forces closely monitored religious activities.”   7. “In  Somaliland the government required religious schools and places of worship to  obtain the Ministry of Religion’s permission to operate. In Puntland religious  schools and places of worship must receive permission to operated from Punt  land’s Ministry of Justice and Religious Affairs.  The TFG and the  Somaliland and Puntland administrations permitted religious instruction in  public schools. Private schools provided the primary source of education in all  regions, with the majority offering religious instruction. A significant number  of externally funded madrassahs existed throughout the country, providing inexpensive  basic education and adherence to conservative Islamic practices. Mogadishu  University, the University of East Africa in Bosasso, Puntland; and many  secondary schools in Mogadishu were externally funded and administered through  organizations affiliated with Al-lslah, an Islamic organization.”  8. “Active  violent conflict among militia groups and the TFG continued during the  reporting period. Some of the militia groups were aligned with al-Shabaab,  which the U.S. secretary of state designated an FTO in 2008. During the  reporting period, al Shabaab militia expanded areas under its control in  Galgaduud Region. In the areas they controlled, al-Shabaab systematically  closed cinemas, burned kosks selling the narcotic khat, shaved the hair of  persons with Western haircuts, order women to be fully veiled, instituted local  bans on smoking and music, and strictly prohibited behavior they deemed  un-Islamic. In October 2009 al-Shabaab militia banned women from wearing  brassieres. The militias patrolled Mogadishu streets inspecting women suspected  of contravening the ban. The media reported that some women were forced to  remove their brassieres. Al-Shabaab claimed wearing brasseries constituted  ‘deception.”    9.  “Non-Muslims who practiced their religion openly faced occasional societal  harassment. Conversion from Islam to another religion was considered socially  unacceptable. Those suspected of conversion faced harassment or even death from  members of their community.  On June 15, 2010 Muslim parents of a Somali  teenage girl beat her severely for converting to Christianity from Islam.  Reports indicated she had been tied to a tree on a regular basis from May 10  when her family became aware of her conversion, and she had also been badly  beaten when she refused to recant her Christian faith.”   10.  “Al-Shabaab killed or wounded hundreds of civilians in several separate suicide  car bomb attacks against TFG and African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM)  targets during the year. On September 17, 2009, al –Shabaab suicide bombers  killed 21 persons, including a dozen AMISOM peacekeepers, and wounded several  others. Five suicide bombers in two cars laden with explosives drove past  security guards at AMISOM headquarters and detonated the explosives inside the  compound.” TANDEM FORUMS: are  invitations to build global awareness of international human rights law  on freedom of religion or belief in local areas as a follow-up to  Universal Periodic Reviews, assess interest, exchange information and  consider local partnerships within and between countries as best  practice models for international human rights law on freedom of religion  or belief.  
               
 III. THE TANDEM PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
  1.  30  Year Anniversary Conference:  The Tandem Project recommends the 30  Year Anniversary of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms  of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief  be held  by the International Somalia Contact Group in a country of its own choosing. In  2001 the 20 year anniversary of the 1981 U.N. Declaration was celebrated with a  conference supported by the United Nations and the U.N. Special Rapporteur on  Freedom of Religion or Belief in Madrid, Spain. In 2006 the 25 year anniversary  of the Declaration was celebrated by OHCHR and the U.N. Special Rapporteur on  Freedom of Religion or Belief in Prague, Czech Republic.   The 30 Year Anniversary  Conference recommendation in support of Somalia and all other Universal  Periodic Reviews held by the U.N. Human Rights Council in the first cycle  2008-2011 include a review of the 2007 and 2010 Special Procedures Mandate for  the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief on the meaning of  the consensus adopted by the U.N. Human Rights Council in 2010 and its  implementation. (V. Background).   In 2007 the  U.N.Human Rights Council mandate for the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of  Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/6/37) failed to achieve consensus because of  objections by Pakistan and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)  over the right to change one’s religion or belief: 9. Urges States:
 
              (a) To ensure that their       constitutional and legislative systems provide adequate and effective       guarantees of freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief to all       without distinction, inter alia, by the provision of effective remedies in       cases where the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or       belief, or the right to practice freely one’s religion, including the       right to change one’s religion or belief, is violated; Pakistan speaking on behalf of 57  countries in the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)  objected by  saying, “It called  for respect for norms about the right to change  one’s religion.  The EU draft explicitly urges States to guarantee the  right to change one’s religion or belief,  a requirement the OIC could not subscribe to.”                Portugal, speaking on behalf of  the European Union (EU) said over 40 paragraphs in the draft resolution was  eliminated in an attempt at consensus with the abstaining states, but consensus  over the right to leave one’s religion or belief is inviolable and could not be  compromised.  The Resolution (A/HRC/RES/6/37) with recorded votes can  be viewed by clicking on this link:http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/HRC/resolutions/A_HRC_RES_6_37.pdf
 2010  Mandate on Freedom of Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/14/11:In 2010 at the 14th  session of the U.N. Human Rights Council Pakistan and the OIC dropped their  objections to the resolution.  The resolution was adopted without a  vote for the three year mandate of the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom  of Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/14/11). Paragraph 9 (a) the point of  tension and abstentions in 2007 was deleted and an amendment withdrawn by  Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and  several other countries to achieve consensus.   Does  (A/HRC/RES/14/11) still urge states to guarantee the right to change one’s  religion or belief as it did in the 2007 resolution or does it accommodate  cultural norms not to change one’s religion?  Paragraph 9 (a)  in the  opinion of the EU still applies to the discharge of duties in 2010 for the U.N.  Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief . Whether the OIC agrees  after abstaining in 2007 based on cultural norms is a key issue and needs clarity for 9 (a) to be fully implemented.  UN Human Rights Council  Resolution on Freedom of Religion or Belief
             If the  mandate in 2010 includes a call to implement 9 (a) it will be a significant step  forward  to resolve the question of universality vs. cultural  relativity on norms that guarantee the right to change one’s religion or  belief.  As a principle of universal democracy the right to leave a  religion is  inviolable for all religions or beliefs, all  governments, all members of the human family.  The global  challenge is to build widespread awareness and acceptance of this right as  international law through dialogue with governments and non-governmental  organizations, civil society, schools and places of worship, including leaders  of the Ummah in Islamic schools and mosques.                 Implementing  9 (a) must respect the sensitivity and complexity of this issue which was one  of the causes of the 1968 impasse by the U.N. in drafting a  legally-binding international treaty (History).  
               
 2.  Forum  for Academic Discourse on Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief. The  Tandem recommends a Minneapolis Forum for Academic Discourse on Human Rights  and Freedom of Religion or Belief be held in preparation for the May Somalia  Universal Periodic Review to consider ways the Charter of the Transitional  Federal Government (TFG) and Constitutions of Somaliland and Puntland   might comply with international human rights norms and standards on freedom of  religion or belief.    The  Transitional Federal Government Charter and the Constitutions of Somaliland and  Puntland currently have provisions that are not in compliance with  international human rights law on freedom of religion or belief. These  discrepancies are outlined in the International Religious Freedom Report on  Somalia; “The Somaliland criminal code outline penalties for Muslims who change  their religion,” On June 30, 2009, “the Puntland parliament approved the  constitution, which went into effect immediately, The new constitution  prohibited propagation of any religion other than Islam. It states that  non-Muslims are free to practice their religion and cannot be forced to  convert; however, the same article prohibits Muslims from converting from  Islam. Puntland security forces closely monitored religious activities.” 
               
 3. Forums  for Academic Discourse on Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief at Mogadishu University and East Africa University, Somalia in partnership with  the University of Minnesota and Augsburg College in the United States and Oslo  University in Norway.   The Tandem  Project recognizes the difficulty Mogadishu University and University of East  Africa in Puntland would face in partnership with Universities in the United  States and Norway, but encourages an invitation to them to build awareness of  international human rights law on freedom of religion or belief for the second  phase of the World Programme for Human Rights Education for the Somalia  Universal Periodic Review.  These Forums would be a multi-disciplinary  academic approaches to carry out the U.N. Human Rights Council draft plan of  action for the second phase (2010-2014) of the World Programs for Human Rights  Education (A/HRC/15/28).               Draft  plan of action for the second phase (2010-2014) of the World Programme for  Human Rights Education (A/HRC/15/28): U.N. Human Rights Council (b) Teaching and learning processes and tools
 27.  Introducing or improving human rights education in the higher education system  requires adopting a holistic approach to teaching and learning, by integrating  programme objectives and content, resources, methodologies, assessment and  evaluation; by looking beyond the classroom and the higher-education  institution to society; and by building partnerships between different members  of the academic community and beyond.  (v) Develop multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary human  rights academic programmes. 20  20 Multidisciplinary programmes would include the study,  research and engagement with human rights from different disciplinary  perspectives, such as philosophy, sociology, languages, international and  domestic law, etc. Interdisciplinary programmes would entail the crossing of  boundaries between disciplines and the pooling of approaches and methodologies  to study, research and engage with human rights with a new integrated  perspective.  
               
 4. Forum  for Places of Worship on Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief. The  Tandem Project recommends Somali leaders, educators and parents participate in  the second Minneapolis-St. Paul Area Forum for Places of Worship – “From the  Very Beginning: Education, Religious Beliefs & Human Rights: Can human  rights law on freedom of religion or belief be taught in places of worship  withoutcompromising faith-based traditions,” to be held 3  February 2010 at the University of Minnesota.                 Tandem Forums  are invitations to build global awareness of international human rights  law on freedom of religion or belief at local levels and to assess  interest, exchange information and consider local partnerships within and between countries as best practice models for international  human rights law on freedom of religion or belief.  
              Our educational systems need to provide  children with a broad orientation: from the very beginning, children should be  taught that their own religion is one out of many and that it is a personal  choice for everyone to adhere to the religion or belief by which he or she  feels most inspired, or to adhere to no religion or belief at all.  5. Forum  for Civil Society on Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief. The  Tandem Project recommends a Minneapolis-St. Paul Area Civil Society Forum on  Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief be held in partnership with,  among others, the Islamic Civic Society of America (ICSA) and Dar Al-Hijrah  Mosque as a follow-up to a lecture by Tariq Ramadan: Coexistence:  Contributing to the Common Good While Maintaining our Values,” sponsored  ICSA and other in St. Paul on 23 December 2010.    
              There is an increase in dialogue today  between religions and other beliefs to embrace diversity, but few persons, less  than one percent of any population, ever participate. This is a challenge. The  value of such dialogues is proportionate to the level of participation. For  civil society increased participation would create opportunities for education  on inclusive and genuine approaches to human rights and freedom of religion or  belief.  (V. Background).  Tariq Ramadan  is a Geneva born Swiss intellectual and professor of Contemporary Islamic  Studies in the Faculty of Oriental Studies at Oxford University. His lecture  was based in part on his book, What I Believe. Quotes relevant to a  Forum for Civic Society on Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief  include: “It is up to Muslim individuals to be and become committed citizens,  aware of their responsibilities and rights. Beyond the minority reflect or the  temptation to see themselves as victims, they have the means to accept a new  age of their history.” And,  “The vital issue today is not to  compare social models or experiences in a fruitless debate but more simply, and  in a far stricter and more demanding way, to take the measure of each society  by comparing the ideas affirmed and proclaimed by its intellectual and  politicians with the concrete practices that can be observed at the social  grass roots: human rights and equality of opportunity (between men and women,  people of different origins, skin colors).                  “Our  societies are awaiting the emergence of a New We, that would bring  together men and women, citizens of all religions-and those without  religion-who would undertake together to resolve the contradictions of their  society” In What I Believe Ramadan reflects on Local, National;  “The future of Western societies is now being played out at the local  level. It is a matter of greatest urgency to set in motion national movements  of local initiatives, in which women and men of different religions, cultures,  and sensitivities can open new horizons of mutual understanding and shared  commitment: horizons of trust. These shared projects must henceforth bring us  together and give birth to a new ‘We’ anchored in citizenship. Of course,  ‘intercultural’ and ‘interfaith’ dialogues are both vital and necessary, but  they cannot have the impact of shared commitment of citizenship in the priority  fields: education, social divides, insecurity, racisms, discriminations, and  more.” The Tandem  Project Recommendations in 2011 will  initiate a Forum for Women on  Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief and a Forum for  Schools (public, private, religious) on Human Rights & Freedom  of  Religion or Belief.
 
               
 IV. CONTACTS Somalia:               Contacts will not be made if  there are safety and security concerns.               International Somalia Contact  Group and OHCHR Stand-alone Interactive Dialogue:               Links are at the beginning of the Somalia Universal Periodic  Review.               Mogadishu University:  http://www.mogadishuuniversity.com/english/index.php University of East Africa, Bosasso: http://www.eastafricauniversity.net/about_eau.asp United States of America:Islamic Society of America (ICSA) & Dar Al-Hijrah  Mosque: http://icsaweb.org/
 Islamic Center of Minnesota: www.islamiccentermn.org Oslo Center for Peace and  Human Rights, U.S. Foundation: http://www.oslocenter.no/ University of Minnesota: http://www1.umn.edu/twincities/academics.php Augsburg College: http://www.augsburg.edu/ United States Universal Periodic Review: http://www.tandemproject.com/issue_statements/statements/2010/120810_upr.htm Norway: Islamic Council of Norway: http://www.christiantoday.com/article/norway.christians.and.muslims.sign.declaration.on.religious.freedom/12636.htm
 Oslo Center for Peace and  Human Rights: http://www.oslocenter.no/ University of Oslo: http://www.uio.no/english/ Norway Universal Periodic Review: http://www.tandemproject.com/issue_statements/statements/2010/121510_upr.htm 
               
 V. FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF U.S. State Department 2010 International Religious  Freedom Report, Somalia Links to State Department sites are welcomed. Unless a  copyright is indicated, information on the State Department’s main website is  in the public domain and may be copied and distributed without permission.  Citation of the U.S. State Department as source of the information is  appreciated.International  Religious Freedom Report 2010
 November  17, 2010               Although the Transitional  Federal Charter (charter) provides for freedom of religion, there were limits  on the extent to which this right was respected in practice.  Active violent conflict among  militia groups and the TFG continued during the reporting period. The  Transitional Federal Government (TFG) generally did not enforce legal  protections of religious freedom in practice. There was a decline in the status  of respect for religious freedom during the reporting period primarily as a  result of extremist militias taking control over significant territory in the  country although some territory has been transferred back to the TFG.  There were reports of societal  abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, and practice.  Militia groups, particularly those associated with the U.S.-designated Foreign  Terrorist Organization (FTO) al-Shabaab harassed persons suspected of  conversion from Islam, killed Sufi clerics, and destroyed Sufi graves and  mosques There were also reports that non-Muslims experienced discrimination,  violence, and detention because of their religious beliefs.  The U.S. government does not  maintain a diplomatic presence, and travel to the country by U.S. government  officials is restricted; however, the U.S. government discussed religious  freedom with its contacts in the country and with regional authorities as part  of its overall policy to promote human rights.               Section I. Religious Demography               The country has an area of  246,200 square miles and a population of seven million; however, population  figures are difficult to estimate since the last census dates from 1975, and the  instability of the country makes precise data collection impossible. A large  majority of citizens are Sunni Muslims of a Sufi tradition. There is a small,  low-profile Christian community and small numbers of followers of other  religions. The number of adherents of strains of conservative Islam and the  number of Islamic schools supported by religiously conservative sources  continued to grow.               Section II. Status of  Government Respect for Religious Freedom Legal/Policy Framework  The charter establishes the norms  for protecting religious freedom. The charter states: "All citizens of the  Somali Republic…have the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law  without distinction of race, birth, language, religion, sex, or political  affiliation."  Although the charter does not  have a section that limits or protects religious practice, article 71 decrees  that the 1960 constitution and other national laws shall apply "in respect  of all matters not covered and not inconsistent with this charter." Article  29 of the constitution states: "Every person has the right to freedom of  conscience and to profess freely his own religion and to worship it subject to  any limitations which may be prescribed by law for the purpose of safeguarding  morals, public health, [and] order."  The TFG exercises limited  control over most of the country, with the exception of the self-declared  Republic of Somaliland in the northwest, which has its own constitution and  legal and policy framework. Somaliland does not recognize the charter or the  transitional process and is seeking recognition as an independent country. The  semiautonomous region of Puntland, which does not seek independence, also has  its own charter and legal framework.  A political process to  establish peace and stability in the country continued as the TFG and the  Alliance for the Reliberation of Somalia (ARS) signed the Djibouti Agreement in  2008. In January 2009 the TFG and ARS formed a unity government, extended the  transitional period by two years, and elected Sharif Sheikh Ahmed as the new  TFG president. On March 15, 2010, as part of the implementation of the Djibouti  peace process, members of a Sufi affiliation, Ahlu Sunna Wal Jama'a (ASWJ),  signed an agreement to join and support the TFG against armed terrorist and  extremist groups opposed to peace and stability. The charter established Islam  as the national religion.  The constitution and charters  governing the various regions provided the right to study and discuss the  religion of one's choice; however, proselytizing for any religion other than  Islam was strictly prohibited. The TFG neither observed nor enforced  constitutional provisions guaranteeing the free exercise of religion. Moreover,  statutes and regulations provided no effective recourse for violations of  religious freedom.  Similarly, Somaliland and  Puntland established Islam as the official religion in their regions. The  Somaliland constitution prohibited the promotion of any religion other than  Islam. The Somaliland criminal code outlined penalties for Muslims who change  their religion. The constitution states that candidates for president, vice  president, or the house of representatives must be Muslim and further  stipulates that Islamic education is compulsory at all levels and that the  promotion of Qur'anic schools is the responsibility of the state. The  constitution further stated that the laws of the nation shall derive from and  not contradict Islam.               The Puntland constitution  provides for the freedom to worship; however, it also states that Muslims  cannot renounce their religion. In May 2009 the Puntland cabinet approved a new  constitution; on June 30, 2009, the Puntland parliament approved the  constitution, which went into effect immediately. The new constitution  prohibited propagation of any religion other than Islam. It states that  non-Muslims are free to practice their religion and cannot be forced to  convert; however, the same article prohibits Muslims from converting from  Islam. Puntland security forces closely monitored religious activities.  In May 2009 the TFG ratified  legislation to implement Shari'a (Islamic law) nationwide. In practice the TFG  does not have the capacity or mechanisms to implement the legislation  uniformly. Since the TFG's ratification of the legislation, there have been no  reports of the implementation.  The judiciary in most regions  relied on some combination of Shari'a, traditional law and Xeer (customary  law), and the penal code of the pre-1991 Siad Barre government. Legal  frameworks varied considerably as each community individually regulated and  enforced religious expression, often on an inconsistent basis.  The TFG and regional  administrations in Puntland and Somaliland observe the following religious  holidays as national holidays: Eid al-Fitr, Eid al-Adha, Muharam (Islamic New  Year), and Mi'raaj; in addition, Friday is designated a weekly day of prayer.  The Somaliland constitution  restricted the formation of political parties based on a particular religious  group, religious beliefs, or interpretations of religious doctrine; however,  the new Puntland constitution had no such restriction on the formation of political  parties based on religious orientation.  The Ministry of Religious  Affairs was authorized to register religious organizations; however, the  ministry has no capacity to conduct registrations.  In Somaliland the government  required religious schools and places of worship to obtain the Ministry of  Religion's permission to operate. In Puntland religious schools and places of  worship must receive permission to operate from Punt land’s Ministry of Justice  and Religious Affairs.  The TFG and the Somaliland and  Puntland administrations permitted religious instruction in public schools.  Private schools provided the primary source of education in all regions, with  the majority offering religious instruction. A significant number of externally  funded madrassahs existed throughout the country, providing inexpensive basic  education and adherence to conservative Islamic practices. Mogadishu  University; the University of East Africa in Bosasso, Puntland; and many  secondary schools in Mogadishu were externally funded and administered through  organizations affiliated with Al-Islah, an Islamic organization.               Restrictions on Religious  Freedom               There was no change in the  status of respect for religious freedom by the TFG during the reporting period.  The TFG generally did not enforce legal restrictions or protections concerning  religious freedom.  There were no public places of  worship for non-Muslims. Although it was illegal to convert from Islam in  Somaliland and Puntland, there were no reported cases of persons punished for  doing so. Proselytizing for any religion except Islam was prohibited in  Puntland and Somaliland and was effectively blocked by informal societal  consensus elsewhere in the country.               Abuses of Religious Freedom               The TGF engaged in armed  conflict with various groups, some of which professed conservative Islamic  beliefs, including al-Shabaab and Hisbul Islam. There also were intermittent  clashes between al-Shabaab and Ahlu Sunna wal Jamaa (ASWJ) militia in Galgaduud  and Banadir Regions.  There were no developments reported  in the case of Abdi Welli Ahmed, a Kenyan citizen and Christian convert from  Islam, whom Somaliland border officials in Wajaale reportedly detained and  assaulted in February 2009 as he tried to cross the border from Ethiopia.  There were no reports of  religious prisoners or detainees in the country               Forced Religious Conversion               There were no reports of forced  religious conversion.               Abuses by Rebel or Foreign  Forces or Terrorist Organizations               Active violent conflict among  militia groups and the TFG continued during the reporting period. Some of the  militia groups were aligned with al-Shabaab, which the U.S. secretary of state  designated an FTO in 2008.  During the reporting period,  al-Shabaab militia expanded areas under its control in Galgaduud Region. In the  areas they controlled, al-Shabaab systematically closed cinemas, burned kiosks  selling the narcotic khat, shaved the hair of persons with Western haircuts,  ordered women to be fully veiled, instituted total bans on smoking and music,  and strictly prohibited behavior they deemed un-Islamic.Throughout the reporting  period, al-Shabaab destroyed graves of Sufi saints, prominent clerics, and  members of other religious groups in areas under its control, igniting conflict  with ASWJ. Al-Shabaab militias killed many prominent leaders from ASWJ in the  Galgaduud Region.
  On May 4, 2010, al-Shabaab  militia fatally shot an underground church leader in Nur who had been on a list  of persons they had suspected of being Christians.  On January 17, 2010, an  al-Shabaab administration in Lower Shabelle stoned and killed Hussein Ibrahim  Mohamed for sexually abusing a young girl under his care.  On November 17, 2009,  al-Shabaab followers stoned a woman to death for alleged adultery in Wajid  District, Bakol Region.  On November 6, 2009, al-Shabaab  members stoned and killed Abdirahman Hussein, in Lower Shabelle Region, for  raping a woman.  At different times in March  2010, al-Shabaab destroyed graves of Somali clerics, reportedly exhuming the  clerics' remains. Destruction of graves and mosques in Mogadishu caused ASWJ  and other local militia groups to arm themselves and wage war against  al-Shabaab in parts of Mogadishu and other regions of the country.  As part of its efforts to have  exclusive control in areas under its control , al-Shabaab confiscated the keys  of four mosques in the Bakara market area. On May 9, 2010, al-Shabaab arrested  a prominent Kismayu cleric and several of his students. Al-Shabaab earlier  warned the sheikh not to conduct Islamic classes in the mosque because they  disagreed with his "questionable views."  On May 4, 2010, ASWJ militia  conducted an operation to confiscate face veils from women at Dabka junction in  Mogadishu. The militia stopped public passenger vehicles at Dabka intersection  and ordered women to remove their face veils. The militia forcefully removed  the veils from women who refused to comply with their order and burned the  veils.  In early February 2010  al-Shabaab started a campaign to shave forcefully young men and teenagers who  they believed to have inappropriate hairstyles.  In October 2009 al-Shabaab  militia banned women from wearing brassieres. The militias patrolled Mogadishu  streets inspecting women suspected of contravening the ban. The media reported  that some women were forced to remove their brassieres. Al-Shabaab claimed  wearing brassieres constituted "deception."  On May 14, 2010, al-Shabaab  released Abdullahi Siyad Kanyare after 75 days of captivity in Middle Shabelle.  Speaking to the media after his release, Siyad said al-Shabaab arrested him on  suspicion that he converted to Christianity after they found a copy of the  Bible in his house. He said a group of foreigners with whom he worked with in  1993 had given him the Bible. Al-Shabaab claimed its courts found Siyad not  guilty of converting to Christianity.               Section III. Status of Societal  Respect for Religious Freedom               There were reports of societal  abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, and practice.  There was strong societal pressure to respect traditions that reflected the  traditional interpretation of Sunni Islam.  Non-Muslims who practiced their  religion openly faced occasional societal harassment. Conversion from Islam to  another religion was considered socially unacceptable. Those suspected of  conversion faced harassment or even death from members of their community.  On June 15, 2010, Muslim  parents of a Somali teenage girl beat her severely for converting to  Christianity from Islam. Reports indicated that she had been tied to a tree on  a regular basis from May 10 when her family became aware of her conversion, and  she had also been badly beaten when she refused to recant her Christian faith.  Al-Shabaab and affiliated  organizations imposed their own interpretation of Islamic laws and practices on  other Muslims. Al-Shabaab destroyed the tombs of Sufi clerics and killed  clerics, civilians, and government officials of Sufi orientation. In targeted  assassinations members of these extremist groups killed TFG officials and  allies and denounced them as non-Muslims or apostates.  Al-Shabaab killed and wounded  hundreds of civilians in several separate suicide car bomb attacks against TFG  and African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) targets during the year.  On September 17, 2009,  al-Shabaab suicide bombers killed 21 persons, including a dozen AMISOM  peacekeepers, and wounded several others. Five suicide bombers in two cars  laden with explosives drove past security guards at AMISOM headquarters and  detonated the explosives inside the compound.  On December 3, 2009, al-Shabaab  killed an estimated 30 persons, including three government ministers, and  wounded more than 60 when a suicide bomber blew himself up at a university  graduation ceremony in Mogadishu.  On May 1, 2010, a twin  explosion at a mosque in Bakara market, Mogadishu, killed an estimated 30  persons and wounded up to 70 others, including a senior al-Shabaab leader.               Section IV. U.S. Government  Policy               The U.S. government does not  maintain a diplomatic presence, and travel to the country by U.S. government  officials is restricted; however, the U.S. government discussed religious  freedom with its contacts in the country and with regional authorities as part  of its overall policy to promote human rights. 
               
 VI.  BACKGROUND               UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS               Whereas recognition  of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members  of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the  world. – First Preamble to the Universal  Declaration of Human Rights.    The principle of universality of  human rights is the cornerstone of international human rights law.
 http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx
 
               
 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ON  FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF   The principal instruments for  International Human Rights Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief is Article 18  of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) and the 1981  U.N. Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of  Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.   The 1981 UN Declaration on the  Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion  or Belief http://www.tandemproject.com/program/81_dec.htm.   General Comment 22 on Article 18 of the International  Covenant on Civil and Political Rights               http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/9a30112c27d1167cc12563ed004d8f15?Opendocument 
               
 Article 18:  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Everyone shall have the right  to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include  freedom to have a religion or whatever belief of his choice and freedom either  individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest  his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.  No one shall be subject to  coercion which would impair his freedom to have a religion or belief of  his   choice. Freedom of manifest one’s  religion or belief may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by  law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, morals or the  fundamental rights and freedoms of others.  The States Parties to the  present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when  applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education in  conformity with their own convictions. 
               
 The Third Rail               International human rights law on  freedom of religion or belief protects theistic, non-theistic and atheistic  beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief, -  General Comment 22 on Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and  Political Rights. The United Nations does not favor one religion or belief over  another. This law protects individuals from discrimination based on religion or  belief. It values the equal rights of majority and minority religions or  beliefs, indigenous, traditional and new religious movements. It is a  universal, neutral and impartial moral principle. Lexicographers may describe  the terminology as agnostic, the third rail on the God idea between  theism and atheism.  
               
 MANDATE OF THE U.N. SPECIAL  RAPPORTEUR ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF   Monitoring the mandate of the  U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/religion/index.htm  Open the link  above to get the complete history, actions and reports of the mandate of the  U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief.  The mandate is  up for review and renewal every three year by the U.N. Human Rights Council.   The most  recent cycle is the mandate from 2007-2010.  A new Special Rapporteur on  Freedom of Religion or Belief was appointed in June, 2010, Mr. Heiner  Bielefeldt of Germany.  The Tandem Project focus under Special Procedures  is solely on the mandate of the Special Rapporteur.   The U.N.  Human Rights Council every three years draft a resolution for the mandate of  the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief who serves as an  independent expert on human rights and freedom of religion or belief through a  process known as Special Procedures.   In 2007 the right  to change one’s religion or belief was resisted by Pakistan on behalf  of the 57 country Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) as a requirement  they could not subscribe to. In 2010 Pakistan and the OIC withdrew the  objection when the U.N. Human Rights Council dropped 9 (a) from the mandate on  freedom of religion or belief without a vote.   
               
 2007  Mandate on Freedom of Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/6/37)  In 2007 the  U.N.Human Rights Council mandate for the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of  Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/6/37) failed to achieve consensus because of  objections by Pakistan and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)  over the right to change one’s religion or belief:   9. Urges States:  
              (a) To ensure that their       constitutional and legislative systems provide adequate and effective       guarantees of freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief to all       without distinction, inter alia, by the provision of effective remedies in       cases where the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or       belief, or the right to practice freely one’s religion, including the       right to change one’s religion or belief, is violated; Pakistan speaking on behalf of 57  countries in the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)  objected by  saying, “It called  for respect for norms about the right to change  one’s religion.  The EU draft explicitly urges States to guarantee the  right to change one’s religion or belief,  a requirement the OIC could not subscribe to.” Portugal, speaking on behalf of  the European Union (EU) said over 40 paragraphs in the draft resolution was eliminated  in an attempt at consensus with the abstaining states, but consensus  over the right to leave one’s religion or belief is inviolable and could not be  compromised.  The Resolution (A/HRC/RES/6/37) with recorded votes can  be viewed by clicking on this link:
 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/HRC/resolutions/A_HRC_RES_6_37.pdf
 
               
 2010  Mandate on Freedom of Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/14/11)  In 2010 at  the 14th session of the U.N. Human Rights Council Pakistan and the  OIC dropped their objections to the resolution.  The resolution was adopted  without a vote for the three year mandate of the U.N. Special Rapporteur on  Freedom of Religion or Belief (A/HRC/RES/14/11). Paragraph 9 (a) the  point of tension and abstentions in 2007 was deleted and an amendment withdrawn  by Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and  several other countries to achieve consensus.   Does  (A/HRC/RES/14/11) still urge states to guarantee the right to change one’s  religion or belief as it did in the 2007 resolution or does it accommodate  cultural norms not to change one’s religion?  Paragraph 9 (a)  in the  opinion of the EU still applies to the discharge of duties in 2010 for the U.N.  Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief . Whether the OIC agrees  after abstaining in 2007 based on cultural norms is a key issue and needs clarity for 9 (a) to be fully implemented: UN Human Rights Council  Resolution on Freedom of Religion or Belief
 
               
 IMPLEMENTING 9 (a)  If the  mandate in 2010 includes a call to implement 9 (a) it will be a significant step  forward  to resolve the question of universality vs. cultural  relativity, for norms that guarantee the right to change one’s religion or  belief.  As a principle of universal democracy the right to leave a  religion is  inviolable for all religions or beliefs, all  governments, all members of the human family.   The global  challenge is to build widespread awareness and acceptance of this right as  international law through dialogue with governments and non-governmental  organizations, civil society, schools and places of worship, including leaders  of the Ummah in Islamic schools and mosques.
               Implementing  9 (a) must respect the sensitivity and complexity of this issue which was one  of the causes of the 1968 impasse by the U.N. in drafting a  legally-binding international treaty (History).  
               
 MANDATES RELATING TO FREEDOM OF  RELIGION OR BELIEF  Mandate of the U.N. Special  Rapporteur on Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and  Expression: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/opinion/index.htm               Mandate of the U.N. Special  Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia  and Related Intolerance: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/racism/rapporteur/index.htm               Ad-Hoc Committee on  Complimentary Standards: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/racism/AdHocCommittee.htm 
               
 TREATIES & DECLARATIONS  International Human Rights Treaties: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/treaty/index.htm The original intent in 1960 was to draft two  core legally binding human rights treaties on religion and race. “ The decision to separate the instruments on religious  intolerance from those on racial discrimination constituted a compromise  solution designed to satisfy a number of conflicting viewpoints. Western states  insisted on addressing both matters in a joint instrument. Communist states  were not anxious to deal with religious matters. African and Asian states  considered the question of religious intolerance a minor matter compared with  racial discrimination.  In contrast to the religious intolerance matter,  international instruments on the elimination of racial discrimination were  adopted fairly swiftly, in 1963 and 1965 respectively.  At the General  Assembly’s twenty-second session, the Third Committee had an opening general  debate and a line-by-line review of the text of the draft convention. The  convention’s most fierce critics were the Soviet Union, other communist states,  and several African and Asian States. Since the draft Convention’s definition  of “religion or belief’ included theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs;  there was strong opposition from Islamic states, the Catholic church, and other  religious groups. At its twenty-third session, the General Assembly decided to  defer consideration of the draft convention.” (History).  In 1968, the UN  deferred work on a legally-binding treaty on religious intolerance as too  complex and sensitive and passed a non-binding declaration in its place. The  Tandem Project believes until a core legally-binding Convention on Freedom of  Religion or Belief is adopted international human rights law will be  incomplete.  
               
 HISTORY & STATISTICS 
              HISTORY: The United Nations failed to achieve consensus on a  legally binding international treaty on religious intolerance, settling instead  for the non-binding 1981 UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of  Intolerance and of Discrimination based on Religion or Belief.  http://www.tandemproject.com/program/history.htm 
              STATISTICS: The United Nations       protects all theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as       the right not to profess any religion or belief. Statistics: builds       the case for an  inclusive and genuine approach to implementing human       rights and freedom of religion or belief.  http://www.tandemproject.com/program/major_religions.htm 
               
 THE TANDEM PROJECT 1984: The Tandem Project co-founder represented the World Federation of United  Nations Associations (WFUNA) in 1984 at the two week Geneva Seminar called by  the UN Secretariat on how to implement the 1981 UN Declaration on the  Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance of Discrimination Based on Religion or  Belief. In 1986 The Tandem Project hosted the first International Conference on  the 1981 U.N. Declaration on Freedom of Religion or Belief.                 1986: Minnesota held the  first International Conference on how to implement the 1981 United Nations  Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of  Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. Thirty-five international delegates  and thirty-five Minnesota delegates were invited. Minnesota organizations and  individuals proposed twenty- seven Community Strategies on how to  implement the 1981 U.N. Declaration under: Synopsis, Strategy, Objectives,  Program Approach, Obstacles and Outcomes. These Community Strategies can  be read on the following link: Minnesota Community Strategies:  http://www.tandemproject.com/tolerance.pdf .
 2011:  Since 1986 The Tandem Project has built support for Human Rights and Freedom of  Religion or Belief simultaneously from top down and ground up. In 1986 the U.N.  Human Rights Commission, now its successor the U.N. Human Rights  Council.  The Tandem Project approach from the ground or local  level up for national Universal Periodic Reviews & Freedom of Religion  or Belief includes; Forums for Places of Worship, Academic Discourse, Schools,  Women and Civil Society.  Tandem Project Database: http://www.tandemproject.com/databases/forms/card.htm               Tandem Project Internet Course: http://www.tandemproject.com/toc/toc.htm  The Questionnaire is a checklist  for inclusive and genuine dialogue on human rights and freedom of religion or  belief and conflicting truth claims, for places of worship, government and  non-governmental organizations, academic institutions, schools and civil  society, in preparation for Tandem Forums. OPEN QUESTIONNAIRE 
               
 Reflections The First Preamble to the  Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads: Recognition of the inherent  dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human  family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.  Surely one of the best hopes  for humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions and other beliefs  accept one another, in which wars and violence are not tolerated in the name of  an exclusive right to truth, in which children are raised to solve conflicts  with mediation, compassion and understanding. There is an increase in  dialogue today between religions and other beliefs to embrace diversity, but  few persons, less than one percent of any population, ever participate. This is  a challenge. The value of such dialogues is proportionate to the level of  participation. For civil society increased participation would create  opportunities for education on inclusive and genuine approaches to human rights  and freedom of religion or belief.   In 1968 the United Nations deferred  passage of a legally-binding convention on religious intolerance saying it was  too complicated and sensitive. Instead, they adopted a non-binding declaration  on the elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on  religion or belief. While very worthwhile, the declaration does not carry the  force and commitment of a legally-binding international human rights convention  on freedom of religion or belief.  Religions and other beliefs  historically have been used to justify wars and settle disputes. This is more  dangerous today as the possible use of nuclear and biological weapons of mass  destruction increases. Governments need to consider whether religions and other  beliefs trump human rights or human rights trump religions and other beliefs or  neither trumps the other. Can international human rights law help to stop the  advance and use of such weapons in the face of this historic truth? 
              QUESTION: Weapons of mass destruction as history teaches are legitimized for national  security and justified by cultural, ethnic and religious or other ideology. The  U.N. Review Conference on the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and studies on biological  and cyber weapons demonstrate advances in science and technology is being used  to increase their potential for mass destruction. The question is whether an  International Convention on Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief,  elevated and supported equally by the U.N. Human Rights Council and U.N.  Security Council, would help offset the risk of weapons of mass destruction.  Recognition of the need for synergy to balance rights and security is the  foundation for solving this issue.  “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds” - Robert  Oppenheimer, quote from the Bhagavad Gita after exploding the first atomic  bomb, Trinity 1945. 
               
 The Tandem Project a non-governmental organization (NGO) founded in 1986 to  build understanding, tolerance, and respect for diversity of religion or  belief, and to prevent discrimination in matters relating to freedom of  religion or belief. The Tandem Project has sponsored multiple conferences,  curricula, reference material and programs on Article 18 of the International  Covenant on Civil and Political Rights- Everyone shall have the right to  freedom of thought, conscience and religion – and the 1981 United Nations  Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination  Based on Religion or Belief.  Documents Attached: Minneapolis, Mogadishu,Oslo - Forums for Academic Discourse on Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief; Minneapolis-St. Paul Area - Forum for Places of Worship on Human Rights & Freedom of Religion or Belief; Muslim Women Gain Higher Profile in U.S |